GTX 1660 Ti With AMD FX-8350 | Does It Cause Any Serious Bottlenecks?

According to the typical Software and Hardware utilization from various programs as well as games, the whole result has been obtained. It varies depending on the operating system, the activity of background operations, and the specific targeting solutions. This result isn’t consistent across all hardware & system environments, and it varies depending on the environment. You should not use the calculator first as a primary decision-making tool but rather as a method to ensure you learn the performance relationship between different parts of your system.

Does 1660 Ti With FX-8350 Cause Any Serious Bottlenecks?

It is undeniable that certain GTX 1660 Ti is a considerably more equipped elevated card, able to run AAA games at 1080p/1440p at 50-60 frame rates. When compared to the competitors in the market in the spending mid-range graphics card market, the GTX 1660 Ti offers an excellent price-to-performance ratio. For memory size, the GTX 1660 Ti has 6144 MB of RAM, which is enough for current games and therefore should not potentially trigger such bottlenecks.

When it comes to maximum load heat, the air conditioning system of the GTX 1660 Ti does an outstanding task of maintaining its cool including under regulation. This configuration of the GTX 1660 Ti and the AMD FX-8350 Eight-Core processor is starting to cause severe bottlenecks across many games, as well as a significant drop in frame rate. In a nutshell, the efficiency is outstanding, and therefore there is no doubt that such significant single GPUs available in 2019.

You may notice an increase or decrease in fps of approximately 5 to 10 percent, however, it is acceptable. The threshold at something I would keep in mind to be a bottleneck is usually between 15 and 20 percent. 

In the case of 1060, I’d recommend upgrading to an improved cooling system than the one which came with it (the Hyper 212 is still a good choice, whenever I’ve been informed that a newer model from Cryrorig maybe even be better). Then, by increasing the clock speed of your Graphics card between 4 to 4.5 GHz, you will notice that the bottleneck has almost completely disappeared from your computer.

Genuinely, if you have the funds, I’d recommend upgrading to a Ryzen 3 1300X conversely. The AM4 system is used, and it is secured to be represented before the year 2020. Furthermore, the DDR4 Memory it employs is significantly more efficient than that of the DDR3 RAM employed by the 8350. 

This will bottleneck when compared to a relatively new CPU, but adding a graphics card would only result in worse efficiency if the graphics card is a poorer one and relatively good performance if the graphics card is a better one. The GPU improvement you’d like would necessitate the purchase of additional RAM (DDR 4) and even new hard disks, as well as the reinstallation of Windows along with all your data. Instead of getting 1060, you could just buy it and update the rest of your system later. 1060 is also still excellent, as well as the 8350/1060 combination should continue to perform admirably in most situations at 1080p. It is not a significant bottleneck.

When it comes to NVIDIA’s xx60 GPUs, they’ve mostly been distinguished by low prices and outcomes that rival those of half graphics processors – especially while turbo boost. The Simply turning video card found within the GTX 1660 Ti has passed our rigorous testing and so we can confidently say that this is a worthy continuation of the pattern. When it comes to artificial standards, the GTX 1660 Ti outperforms the GTX 1060 6GB or even, astonishingly, indeed the GTX 1070. 

Gaming quality did not match up to the high standards. Even though the 1660 Ti regularly outperforms the GTX 1060 having 6Gb in terms of refresh rate, the difference is not significant enough to explain an improvement. Users were capable of playing Borderlands 3, Anthem, Need For Speed, Call of Duty, Heat, Just Cause 4, and Black Ops Cold War at refresh rates ranging from 62 to 77 frames per second, and maintained gaming performance hovering at about 70 frames per second in 1080p High Resolution.

Games such as GreedFall, Death Stranding, Hitman 2,  F1 2019, and Black Ops 4 have all been playable at 64 to 70 frames per second in 1440p 4×4 HD, with a refresh rate hovering at approximately 68 frames per second on the highest setting we tested. Users were capable of playing Valorant at a refresh rate ranging from 139 to 139 fps through 2160p 4K as well as maintained gaming performance hovering roughly 139 fps throughout the test. 

According to the 1660 Ti, it would be among the RTX 3050 Ti & RTX 3050, descending 5.4 percent extremely slow than that of the RTX 3050 Ti as well as speedier than just the RTX 3050 (4.8 percent slower than the RTX 3050 Ti). When compared to the other graphics cards on this list, which have an ordinary performance rating. 

According to NVIDIA, the 1660 Ti is located in the middle of its class, dropping 1 percent harder than the RX 5700 while dropping 0.8 percent rapidly than just the RX 5600 XT. When compared to the other graphics cards on this list, this has a typical relative efficiency rating. It is possible to get 60 frames per second from the 1660 Ti throughout this round. The RX 5700 produces results that are indistinguishable from that of the ATI.

According to the results of a standard of six matches, the AMD FX-8350 slowdowns the GTX 1660 Extremely by an average of 43.3 percent at 1080p – mega configurations. 

The FX-8350 is only capable of handling video games with extremely low CPU demands. Grand Theft Auto V runs at 1080p of ultra quality configurations on the FX-8350, which has 8th gen intel core as well as 8 threads, & suffers from severe display falls due to this underclocked of the 1660 Ultra. 

Utilizing ultra-quality setups through Shadow of the Tomb Raider at 1080p resolution, the FX-8350 outperforms the 1660 Ultra by 46%.

The FX-8350 becomes bottlenecks this same 1660 Ultra through 40% at 1080p utilizing ultra generally designed in Epic Heroes war when playing at 1080p with ultra-effective ways to increase. 

With Battlefield V, the FX-8350 outperforms the 1660 Ultra by 45.4 percent at 1080p with the ultra providing several tools, according to the manufacturer.

Conclusion

So far, we have shared all the prominent information about the performance and bottlenecks between GTX 1660 Ti and AMD FX-8350. It is clear by now that their combination can cause severe bottlenecks in modern games along with noticeable FPS loss. If you have other queries, feel free to knock us.